 |
         |
|
|
|
|
Re: API Change (858) |
Date Posted: Sep 2, 2008 1:14am |
 |
| |
| Yep. That's lame! |
|
|
Re: API Change (858) |
Date Posted: Sep 24, 2008 12:43pm |
|
| |
| Why.Cn also limit? |
|
|
Re: API Change (858) |
Date Posted: Oct 10, 2008 1:25pm |
|
| |
| Why do I still have restrictions on the API? |
|
|
Re: API Change (o_g_khmelnitsky_ua) |
Date Posted: Dec 14, 2008 9:06pm |
|
| |
>But I see, that Snapnames may send to Verisign registry thousands queries without limitations
Hey, if you want dynadot to compete with snap, be sure to tell them you'll fund the creation of 1000's of "boutique" registrars so Dynadot can pool their registry connections for you. |
|
