|
|
Subject: Dynadot DNS Improvement |
Date Posted: Dec 20, 2006 10:58pm PST |
|
| |
You can now specify a different ip address for:
mydomain.com
www.mydomain.com
Before both had to have the same ip address.
Also, we added support for CNAME records. |
| |
|
|
Re: what about full dns management? |
Date Posted: Jan 5, 2007 1:18pm PST |
|
| |
I appreciate the CNAME support, but what about offering full DNS access
to advanced users? What if I want to modify the TTL values?
Or create a SRV record?
What if I want to specify a distinct MX record for a subdomain?
What if I want to treat dynadot nameservers as public secondaries, and
maintain dns through my own private master?
Right now I feel like I'm using mitts, which limits my enthusiasm for dynadot. |
|
|
Re: great ideas |
Date Posted: Jan 7, 2007 12:04am PST |
|
| |
| You make some very good suggestions. I have added them to our feature request list. |
|
|
Re: great ideas (dynadot_staff) |
Date Posted: Jul 29, 2008 9:59am PDT |
|
| |
It has been some time since the first discussion here. I'm also interested in SRV records support, would you please let me know when do you plan to add this feature?
[This post has been edited by z_m_skopje_mk on Jul 29, 2008 10:00am.] |
|
|
Re: great ideas (z_m_skopje_mk) |
Date Posted: Jul 30, 2008 12:53pm PDT |
|
| |
Agreed with the above.
It's a step in the right direction but DNS management can still be improved. Your call Dynabest o:) |
|
|
Re: Dynadot DNS Improvement (dynadot_staff) |
Date Posted: Aug 2, 2008 4:19am PDT |
|
| |
Related to this, could you please explain why there are (what I see as) arbitrary limits on the number of DNS records one can have with the Dynadot DNS?
The number of A and CNAME records is sufficient, but why only 3 MX records? Why not just say 25 A, CNAME or MX records?
UPDATE: Especially as you just recently combined the A and CNAME records...
[This post has been edited by m_k_helsinki_fi on Aug 2, 2008 4:21am.] |
|
|
Re: Dynadot DNS Improvement (tpol) |
Date Posted: Oct 21, 2009 6:51am PDT |
|
| |
Hi Dynadot,
Please give us feedback whether you are going to implement the DNS SRV records feature soon, or we should look for this option at 3rd parties. |
|
|
Re: ... |
Date Posted: Jan 26, 2011 4:37am PST |
|
| |
We have the same questions. Why only 3 MX records? Why is the DNS TTL not modifiable? Why is the original post from this topic over 4 YEARS ago and nothing has been done to fix the situation?
[This post has been edited by solarsky on Jan 26, 2011 4:45am.] |
|
|
Re: ... (solarsky) |
Date Posted: Jan 27, 2011 12:09pm PST |
|
| |
| We believe that for most customers, 3 MX records and the 4 hour DNS TTL is sufficient. Also, there are a number of free DNS service providers you can use. That said, for 2011 we are looking to upgrade our hardware to better accommodate advanced users. |
|
|
Re: ... (dynadot_staff) |
Date Posted: May 26, 2011 8:14am PDT |
|
| |
Just wanted to say I was coming here to ask for this as well.
For example I'm moving my name servers to a new server with a new IPs and it would be (err would have been) extremely helpful to use dynadot as a transitional service while I transfer the private nameservers to the new IPs.
Most every other registrar I have used offers this, but I was surprised it is not here! |
empty